Hi everybody,
We have a requirement wherein we need to assign multiple Shipping Types to each route.
For Eg: 21 and 22 Shipping Type to route XYZ
I discovered this can be done when we define legs. However business do not have legs in their Route so this solution is ruled out.
Do we have any other way to meet this requirement. Please help.
Thanks
Hi,
I am facing the following error when I try to reverse the outbound delivery through the transaction VL09.
There is no material document that can be cancelled in these HUs' history
I've read the SAP note 1790073 - Unable to reverse STO delivery through VL09 with HU's and understand this is the standard behaviour. According to this, shall I proceed the following steps ?
1) Delete the existing outbound delivery and create new.
2) PGI
3) Create inbound delivery with reference to outbound delivery
4) PGR
5) Create STO from the receiving plant (Triggering in opposite direction)
6) Create delivery --> PGI ---> Inbound delivery ---> PGR
Please suggest else could anybody guide me how to resolve this issue and what would be the best approach ?
Regards,
Rosh
Hi:
Has anyone worked with Network order via WM-PP Interface?
Network is created via tocde CN22.
Through LP10 we run the WM staging, all goes well and the TR gets created from LP10 and TR has the destination storage type as 100 (Production staging) with WM movement type of 319.
To is created from the TR (from above) with destination type 100 and confirmed.
We execute 281 via MIGO and inventory is relieved from 100 storage type BUT new TR is created from the 281 movement type. I don't think it should create a new TR since inventory is no longer in 100 anymore, it has already been back flushed. Any idea why another TR is getting created? How do I avoid another TR from getting created, for the 261 movement we are not seeing another TR getting created.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Experts,
While creating Transfer order against Delivery , it has been observed that storage type search would be 001 002 in Development server.
But when we execute the same scenario in Quality server , the search sequence is 004 005 for same Material (Set with same Stock removal indicator), also the search sequence maintained in-configuration is same in both the sever i.e no configuration change observed.
Please suggest me what could be the issue in this?
hi all,
i am creating a shipment document for two deliveries. the delivery detailes are as follows
for delivery 1, shipping point A is in germany AND ROUTE is AA and ship to party is in germany.
for delivery 2, shipping point B is in germany and route is BB and ship to party is in america.
now iam using collective shipment type and in the config of shipment type, the leg indicator is "legs determined according
to departure point and intineray " and leg indicator is "direct leg "
now i have created the shipment and the stages are determined as follows :-
stage 1 from shipping point A in germany to shipping point B in germany (system shows this as preliminary leg)
stage 2 from shipping point B to ship to party in germany (system shows this as main leg )
stage 3 from shp to party in germany to ship to party in america. (system shows this as subsequent leg)
my questions are as follows :-
1) how does the systen determines the itinerary. that is, what caused system to first select shipping point A and then
shipping point B for stage 1 in shipment document and why not first shipping point B and then shiiping point A ?
2) Why did the system chose ship to party in germany in stage 2 and why not ship to party in america for stage 2 ?
regds
pamela
Edited by: Pamela79 on Apr 13, 2011 2:40 PM
I have error in Cogi for movement type 261 that Storage type XXX is not suitable as an interim Storage Area.
I have checked at WM movement type level there is no Storage type XXX mentioned anywhere.
Hi experts,
Can we change the shipping data in the ME32L for the cross company SA,
The type is NLCC.
the fields are greyed.
then i change the loading group in the material master data, how the SA can read the change and redetermine the shipping point ?
I have read the notes 498143,769579,303453, But not find any method.
Does it the SAP standard behavior that can't change shipping data in the ST SA.
thanks in advance.
Dear all,
I would like to know if there is a possibility to generate an inbound shipment cost document before the goods receipt?
Actually we are buying material that is transported by train. It takes about 20 days to receive the goods at our plant but the rail carrier will send the invoice before we receive the goods. The issue is that we don't have any accrual and we are unable to pay the carrier in time. In addition we cannot do invoice verification in MIR7.
For information we use PO, Inbound delivery, Inbound shipment, Shipment cost document.
Is there any solution in SAP?
Thanks
Hello
Requirement is to consume the packaging material in the delivery.
We had created new mat type copying VERP.Checked the chk box QTY Update in the config.Now when HU is created the requirement is inventory has to get updated for the packaging material along with Material that is packed.
Thanks in asdvance
Regards
Shekar
Hi
While confirming Transfer Order on RF , Transaction LM05 or LM07 , I am getting an error :
One item in transfer order 0000001
is from bulk storage type
Since the TO source storage type is Bulk Storage , SU is not proposed.
If we confirm using LT12 , we are prompted to enter Source SU ( scan ) , and the one which is easily accessible in front side of the bin
is scanned.The TO is then confirmed.
At LMO5 we get the field Very SU , but even if we scan , we get message "an internal error has occured".
If we leave it blank and select material and proceed , we get error - "
One item in transfer order 0000001300
is from bulk storage type
is there anyway , we can confirm such TOs on RF ?
is it not supported on RF ?
Regards / Vinod Sedani
Hi gurus,
i need to find a way to send an Outbound IDoc to an external system regarding changes to batch characteristics.
This is the scenario: every time that someone throught transaction MSC2N changes some characteristics an outbound IDoc must be sent to the external system to upload the data regarding the modified batch.
Hope someone could help me on this topic.
Thanks
Hi,
I am in the process of setting up batch determination for WM. Batches will be assigned when the transfer order is created, rather than in the delivery. I have noticed that quite a few fields are not populated in KOMKH and KOMPH.
From my investigation I have found that these tables can be manipulated in the function module VB_BATCH_DETERMINATION. I have tried placing a break point in the user exit EXIT_SAPLV01F_002. I can breakpoint in VB_BATCH_DETERMINATION but I cannot work out where I need to apply the change. Any advice would be most welcome.
Kind Regards,
Jacque
Hi all,
Can anyone please explain what the difference between LI11 and LI11N is?
Thanks
Moni
Hello All,
I need your valuable suggestion on the best approach to follow on this.
We are implementing QM in our existing SAP system. Currently we have WM implemented and all our inbound deliveries are first putaway then we subsequently do GR
As SAP does not allow IBDs to be created for a WM managed location for QM active material we changed the business process whereby we will first do GR and then putaway against the material document. The existing item category configuration has been changed to make it not relevant for putaway.
The new process is working fine, however we have huge number of inbound deliveries (close to 30 thousand) which are open and have associated shipment documents. As expected the new configuration does not change the putaway relevance in the existing inbound deliveries and we have been unable to make the system re-read the configuration.
We cannot use the existing method for receiving (putaway and GR) for all the existing IBDs because then our QM inspection lots will be messed up and also we want to have one generalised method going forward.
Is there any way of updating the existing IBD status (VBUK/VBUP) to reflect the new config and make it not relevant for Putaway and WM.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Gurus,
Request your help to know the correct process to assign the resource to a TO task in T.code LTRMS. Steps I have followed :-
1. Create Inbound delivery for Putaway.
2. Create TO and this TO with sub task can be seen in LTRMS. This TO needs to be confirmed only by TRM and using RF (LP00)
3. Created Resource element for my SAP user ID and also device to present in T.code LP00.
4. After logging to LP00 and then going to LTRMS to assign the task to Resource, I am not able to see my user ID and unique resource number to assign.
5. Once this resource is assigned then I go back to LP00 to confirm the putaway for TO task
I have created resource element for my user id and device in the T.code LRSW.
I think I am not doing correct procedure. Could you please guide me or send me any document showing step by step to do this. I have attached few screenshots as below.
Regards,
Shashidhar
IMG -> Logistics Execution -> Shipping -> Deliveries -> Deliveries -> Define Delivery Types
Automatic packing is set for inbound delivery type (EL).
We have only set up automatic packing for a single plant.
When we perform a manual inbound delivery for all plants everything is fine but through EDI we get the idoc warning:
if packing has not been set up for the plant.
Is there a way to ignore automatic packing for all plants except the relevant plant? Or stop the idoc warning from occurring at all?
Our client has a migration task where we are converting the inventory from Navision systems to SAP ECC. Could anyone throw some light from previous experiences on the fields that can be mapped to the following one's.
Material Number | Plant | Sloc | Batch | Unrestricted Qty | In Quality Inspection | Blocked | UOM | Special Stock Indicator | Customer | Vendor | Date of Manufacture |
MATNR | WERKS | LGORT | CHARG | LABST | INSME | CSPEM | ERFME | SOBKZ | KUNNR | LIFNR | HSDAT |
Any inputs on this would be very helpful
Dear all,
Im aware of the SAP standard process for Goods issue to Manual Reservation/PM order in IM level first(MIGO)
and doing WM level TO creation(LT06) and TO confirmation(LT12).
My client would like to have the process initiated in WM since post IM level goods issue,
there are chances of stock issue discrepancy at wm level from warehouse.
In order to build this gap we are planning for a development as below but having
issue in clearance of positive qty Quant from 911 storage type.
Scenario as below.
1.Reservation is generated from PM order or Manual.
2. Created a program similiar to LT01 for direct multiple materials TO creation with reference to
Reservation which will read open reservation line items and create Transfer Order.
The transfer order created have the Actual bin as Source bin and Destination bin as Dynamic bin 911 stype(Reservation no)
3.Now during TO confirmation stock will be moved from Actual bin and destination bin 911 is having positive stock.
Post confirmation immediately triggeed a BAPI MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT for Goods Issue against Reservation/PM order.
TR creation is deactivated for IM movement type to avoid a negative qty Quant line will get created.
Need suggestion on if there is any possibility through customization to clear automatic the 911 positive qty generated during TO confirmation or
after IM level goods issue.
Manual moving the qty from 911 to 999 differences etc doesn't suit since correct qty issue or clearance has to happen against order,reservation to flow cost correctly.
Looking forward for your valuable suggestions or solution if any one had customized on similar requirement.
I have gone through below posts which have been answered for similiar requirements.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3242315
https://scn.sap.com/thread/3260837
Thanks in advance
Regards
Max
Dear All,
I have configured shipment cycle with standard Transportation planning Point-0001. Created shipment document-VT01N and cost document-VI01. Shipment costs are calculated as per the pricing procedure determined and the value maintained in condition record for condition type FB00.
My query is that on what basis/parameters shipment cost item category is determined in the shipment cost document.
I have searched lots of posts for the same which talk about configuration required. That was done but could not get answer to determination of shipment item category.
Regards
Vikas
Hi all,
Asking for your helphereto seean error thatis presentingmein generatinganOTfrom anABAPprogramusing thefunctionL_TO_CREATE_MULTIPLE.
in some casesit generatesthe error "Requested amountnot could beSupplied." But so farI have notIndentifytobethis error.
I checkin theLS26and if they havestockavailableall materials.
Someidea of thiserror??
Thanks
Luiz Huelsmann