Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - ERP SCM Logistics Execution
Viewing all 912 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Configuration for IM Movement type 631with WM

April 25, 2016, 9:23 am
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

I struck in one Issue for configuration of movement type: 631. We have both HU Managed and Non HU Managed Storage Location.

 

For HU managed Storage Location +ve quant generated in 910 storage type. Once the delivery is Completed stock remove from 910. This work as per Standard.

 

 

Issue with Non-HU Managed Storage Location.: - VE quant generated in 910 storage type . However Stock move from Unrestricted to Customer Consignment stock in IM level.


WM Movement type:955 created  and assign to IM Movement type. Below is snap Shot for movement type
Capture.JPGCapture1.JPG

 

Is there any thing missing in configuration. -ve quant need to remove as soon as Material document created. Kindly help!!

 

Appreciate all your valuable inputs/ feedback.

 

Warm Regards

↧
Search

Picking before good issue

March 22, 2016, 8:50 pm
$
0
0

Dear SAP experts,

 

We are in SAP ECC 6.0, we are using SAP WM (not EWM) and we're already have process for picking for delivery where the sequence is:

 

1. SO created

2. delivery created

3. Picking executed (create and confirm TO),

4. Post good issue

 

We're rolling out the functionalities to other department in our company and we're going to have scenario to issue the material from warehouse to Internal Order and PM Work Order. As far as i know the standard sequence will be:

 

1. Good issue --> TR created

2. Create and confirm TO

 

We're afraid that this will confuse the operation. Is there anyway that for cases for issuance to Intenal order and PM workder the sequence to be:

 

1. Reservation created (either manually against Internal Order OR automatically through PM Work Order)

2. Picking executed (create and confirm TO),

3. Post Good issue

 

Appreciate your help on this

John

↧
↧

Create handling unit and assign it to shipment

April 26, 2016, 3:58 am
$
0
0

Dear SAP experts,

 

We have scenario, where we're renting containers, and we use the containers repeatedly in various shipments. There is a requirement to track the location of the container, and what is the current content of the container.

 

We are thinking to do this:

1. Create non-assigned handling unit (so we can create so-called container master data with specific id)

2. Create deliveries and pack to boxes (another handling unit)

3. Create shipment, assigning related multiple deliveries into the shipment and pack to container (using the HU created in point 1)

 

The problem is we just find out that the non-assigned handling unit cannot be used during packing in shipment. If we create a new HU during shipment it is possible, but our requirement is to track specific container, so if we create new ones for every shipment, we cannot really track where the container is.

 

However I think the requirement is very logical in business sense, and I'm sure that i'm not the first one encountering this kind of requirement, can anyone suggest how we can handle this requirement?

 

Best regards,

John

↧

Putaway: ignore bins with weight limitations

April 22, 2016, 5:46 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

how can i make sure that during putaway certain bins are being skipped because they can't handle heavy pallets.

It concerns high rack storage. As a test I've put max weight with indicator 1 in the concering storage type. Now an error is raised during stock placement with too much weight. Now my customer wants no errormessage but it wants the bins which cannot handle the weight to be skipped and a suitable bin to be proposed.

I thought about entering a loading equipment quantity in the material master on the WM2 view. Is this the correct way or are there other options?

Appreciate it!

 

Mark

↧

consumption of packaging material in delivery

April 26, 2016, 7:10 am
$
0
0

Hello

 

Requirement is to consume the packaging material in the delivery.

 

We had created new mat type copying VERP.Checked the chk box QTY Update in the config.Now when HU is created the requirement is inventory has to get updated for the packaging material along with Material that is packed.

 

Thanks in asdvance

 

Regards

 

Shekar

↧
↧

How to setup unique storage type for In house GR and External GR?

April 14, 2016, 1:37 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

We want to setup unique storage type for in house and external GR's.

 

I see the Mvt type 103 is used for both the flows (In house and External) for production orders.

 

How can we give separate storage type for In house and External?

 

Regards,

Srinivas

↧

VI01/VI02 - Change hkont

April 26, 2016, 9:31 am
$
0
0

Hello guys,

 

I´m trying to find a user-exit or BADI to change HKONT in the Shipment Costs document posting..

I´ve tried anything possible and none of the options do what it is I want.. either I can only use on VI01 (BADI_SCD_ACCTG) but can't change HKONT - only SAKTO; or I can't change anything BADI_SCD_SAVE.

 

The OBBH (substitution) is not working properly because the previous ABAPer uses memory to get the parameters and the information is getting mixed up, so I´m trying to find another way.

 

Again, the need is: change BSEG-HKONT field, during a VI01/VI02 Shipment Costs document posting.

 

Any help would be welcome.

 

Ricardo

Brazil

↧

Inbound Delivery for Item Category Configuration Change QM/WM

April 27, 2016, 8:27 am
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

I need your valuable suggestion on the best approach to follow on this.

 

We are implementing QM in our existing SAP system. Currently we have WM implemented and all our inbound deliveries are first putaway then we subsequently do GR

 

As SAP does not allow IBDs to be created for a WM managed location for QM active material we changed the business process whereby we will first do GR and then putaway against the material document. The existing item category configuration has been changed to make it not relevant for putaway.

 

The new process is working fine, however we have huge number of inbound deliveries (close to 30 thousand) which are open and have associated shipment documents. As expected the new configuration does not change the putaway relevance in the existing inbound deliveries and we have been unable to make the system re-read the configuration.

 

We cannot use the existing method for receiving (putaway and GR) for all the existing IBDs because then our QM inspection lots will be messed up and also we want to have one generalised method going forward.

 

Is there any way of updating the existing IBD status (VBUK/VBUP) to reflect the  new config and make it not relevant for Putaway and WM.

 

Thanks in advance.

↧
Search

Delivery deletion issue

April 27, 2016, 12:19 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am facing a strange issue with delivery deletion .

 

a) User had processed a delivery for a sales order which is WM relevant.

b) TO created but not confirmed.

c) Due to order cancellation, we want to delete this delivery, hence tried to process LT0G to return back the units withdrawn from 916 to High Rack

d) Unfortunately we were not able to do so and referring a SAP note, we did a manual material movement from 916 to HRS through LT10 instead of processing through LT0G.

e) Now the delivery Overall pick status = C and Picked qty in Picking tab is greyed out which is not allowing to make it to Zero.

 

However i need to delete the delivery, how to fix this bug. Any workarounds ?

 

Regards,

Dilli

↧
↧

901 Storage type

April 14, 2016, 5:28 am
$
0
0

Good day,

 

Here at BATSA we are encountering the scenario where 901 FG's is reflecting in WM as well as IM but no GR was done for that stock. Due to this planning is seeing stocks which is in essence not GR'd yet and no physical stocks has been received. Please note that we are using GMES which is interfacing into SAP WM at GR point. My concern is that whatever registers in SAP at GR point into GR dock(PS1) is reflecting in GR dock and not in 901 type. MVT 101 would be triggered at this stage.

 

With which stock or movements can I reconcile the stock showing in 901 and why is it showing as a positive in 901 in the first place?

 

Thank you

↧

Restrict the list of vehicles and drivers

April 28, 2016, 3:53 am
$
0
0

Dear Champs!

 

I want to know how I can restrict the list of Vehicles and Drivers in the LE shipment document.

In the sales order we assign the customer ‘abc’ and product ‘xyz’ and make delivery and assign this delivery document to the shipment document.

In LE shipment Document, I want to restrict the vehicle and driver list this is I want to see only those vehicles that are dedicated to this customer ‘abc’ and its specific product ‘xyz’.

Further I want to see only those drivers in the shipment document who are assigned to selected vehicle.

Is there any standard way to achieve this requirement.

--


Thanks

↧

Restrict the list of vehicles and drivers

April 28, 2016, 3:55 am
$
0
0

Dear Champs!

 

I want to know how I can restrict the list of Vehicles and Drivers in the LE shipment document.

In the sales order we assign the customer ‘abc’ and product ‘xyz’ and make delivery and assign this delivery document to the shipment document.

In LE shipment Document, I want to restrict the vehicle and driver list this is I want to see only those vehicles that are dedicated to this customer ‘abc’ and its specific product ‘xyz’.

Further I want to see only those drivers in the shipment document who are assigned to selected vehicle.

Is there any standard way to achieve this requirement.

--


Thanks

↧

Automatic PO Creation with reference to Agreement in Shipment Cost

April 28, 2016, 2:20 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are implementing the "Transportation" functionality under the Logistics Execution section.

 

We have completed the configuration and, now, automatic PO is getting generated along with Service Entry Sheet when we are clicking "Transfer" in the Shipment Cost document.

 

The client wants the automatic PO to get generated against an existing outline agreement with the Vendor/Transporter/Service Agent, so that the open quantity in the outline agreement gets reduced as soon as a shipment has been carried out.

 

Please suggest if this can be achieved.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Debarshi

↧
↧

Problem with physical inventory document deletion in WM

April 11, 2016, 11:01 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

I am facing an issue regarding deletion of physical inventory document that was created for one of the bins in our warehouse.

In order to carry out Physical inventory I created document using LI01N for a bin having 3 quants. However after creation some reason I decided to delete the same. So I deleted the same in LI02N by deleting it's line item (there was only 1 line item).

After this deletion I can not see / display document using LI03N or LI02N which is perfecting fine. Even this document has no records in PI tables i.e. LINK, LINP however there is still an entry in table LINV which stands for physical inventory status for the quant. Because of this entry for associated quants in the bin; system is still showing inventory status active which is preventing creation new PI document. Also in the bin master in the inventory tab system is showing entry of deleted document number with status is not counted.

Can anybody please help me in resolving this issue as how I can release quants from active PI status and create new PI document.

I checked SAP note 824904 however after execution of program per this note system is showing message that PI document is still active nothing to correct.

Thanks,

 

Ritesh

LINK.PNG

LINV.PNG

LS02N.png

↧

Deliveries stuck in stor type 916

April 28, 2016, 5:26 am
$
0
0

Hi,

I am facing an issue regarding clearing stock stuck in storage type 916. I know there are many threads regarding this but, I have still not found exact solution that needs to be implemented to clear this stock.

Basically after analyzing stock situation using LX03 report; I have categorized all the deliveries in 916 in four categories ,

 

1) User already deleted delivery now only empty dynamic bin is appearing in 916.

2) User already deleted delivery, but dynamic bin has got stock in it.

3) Delivery exists and PGI for entire qty. completed however it still continues to appear in 916.

4) Delivery exists and PGI is pending.

 

Regarding item 4) I can understand or expect that once PGI is done it should go away from 916. However I am clear as how to deal with first 3 cases.

I have already checked associated TOs in LT22 however I could not find any unconfirmed TO. Some of these deliveries are as old as year 2012.

Can anybody please provide some guidance for this?

Thanks,

 

Ritesh 

↧
Search

One delivery on Multiple Shipment reporting

April 28, 2016, 3:07 am
$
0
0

Shipment creation is automated via an interface.  However, due to the needs of the business (although not in this countyr).  Our platform requires the system to permit one deilivery to be added to multiple shipments.  On occasion human error result sin users creating multiple shipments on one delivery and despite trying several obvious transactions I cannot find a report that displays shipments with the delivery number so I can filter duplicates to allow duplicate shipments to be deleted.

 

ANy one have any ideas?

 

Thanks in advance

↧

"ATP" check on storage bin

April 29, 2016, 2:58 pm
$
0
0

Is it possible to influence the "available" stock quantity in a storage bin? I would like that the system considers non confirmed putaway to's as available stock.

 

I will clarify my question with an example:

Bin quantity = 10 pc

I have a non confirmed putaway TO for 5 PC to that bin.

 

I would like to have an available bin quantity of 15 pieces, I should be able to create a pick TO for 15 pieces.

↧
↧

WM Inventory count log report (after clearing differences in WM)

May 1, 2016, 3:42 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I am looking for a report similar to LX17 but want the data after we have cleared the differences in WM (i.e. after LI20 has been posted).

Requirement is to provided count stats to business ( i.e. book inventory, counted qty, differences,etc) on a monthly basis.Issue is after we have posted LI20, I can't find a report similar to LX17 which shows me the difference history, etc.

 

Please can any one help/ advise.

 

Many thanks,

S.

↧

Inbound delivery qty cannot be less than previously GR-posted qty

June 30, 2010, 2:50 am
$
0
0

Kindly suggest what could be the reason for appearing the subject line error message while doing GR-MIGO w.r.t inbound delivery.

 

Regards

↧

Update net & bruto weight of item in HU

April 27, 2015, 4:06 am
$
0
0

Hello all,

 

I'm creating a new Handling Unit using the BAPI : bapi_hu_create, when I'm

doing so, the system creates a HU with wanted quantity in the base unit of material.

 

The base unit of my item is not KG but each unit of item (each carton) have different weight

that is different from what is mention in the master data (MM03).

 

How can I update the real weight of each item in this handling unit during it's building process

or right after commit of this process ?

 

Thank you,

Kind Regards,

Amit Berku

↧
Viewing all 912 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>