Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - ERP SCM Logistics Execution
Viewing all 912 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

RLAUTA10 not picking up TR

February 1, 2016, 12:11 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

When I run RLAUTA10 for automatic TO creation; the TR is not getting picked to convert to a TO although  I can see the TR via Tcode LB11.  In fact in LB11 I can process the TR to convert to TO manually but I want it to be done via RLAUTA10.  If I were to look at the error mail log this particular TR is not included.

 

For movement type 101 I have the "Automatic TO" set under the 101 movement type under "movement types in the warehouse management system" in configuration.

 

Thanks in advance, I have read through SCN threads but I have not been able to find anything similar.

↧
Search

LT03 Storage bin issue

January 18, 2016, 3:00 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

 

We are using “Shelf life expiration date” for stock removal strategy.

 

We are keeping the same material with same batch number in different storage bins.

 

  1. Creating the Sales order: In sale order we are creating the 2 line items for same material code i.e. chargeable and free items.
  2. Out bond delivery: In outbond delivery assigning the same batch for both line item hence for both line items  are same material code and batch number. (One is Chargeable and another one is free)
  3. Creating the TO in VL02N by choosing the subsequent function (or LT03) and we are choosing the “Generate TO item (F6) in LT03 screen.

 

The issue is while creating the TO, each line item qty picking from different bin because same material with same batch number keeping in different bin. Our requirement is it should not pick from different bin because still stock is available first bin. (Both items should pick from same bin).

 

I checked with manual option but it is time consuming and min having 100 or more line items in the Delivery.

 

 

Please suggest how to restrict the picking from different bin if the material code and batch number is same. 

 

 

Regards,

Hanmanth

↧
↧

Cycle Counting - Transfer order

February 1, 2016, 11:48 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

Is there a way to use cycle counting without closing all the open TO? I need to find a way to process cycle counts with open transfer orders.

 

Thank you?

↧

Strategy for putaway (P - Storage unit type) special bin possible?

February 3, 2016, 12:20 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

In one of our warehouses we have a special situation and I am wondering if it is possible.

 

We defined for below bin, that it is possible to only put 2 HIGH pallets (with storage bin type allowing 2 quants)

rack.JPG

Now it should be possible to put 2 other storage units in the "empty" spot. Because of the lack of space the people want to use this. In that spot they are able to put one LOW pallet and an MEDIUM pallet. Storage bin type = "SP" special.

 

So the combinations would be:

2 X HIGH

1 X MEDIUM

 

or

 

2 X HIGH

1 X LOW

 

If I define the bin sectioning for the storage bin type I can assign the maximum nr. of quants.

- "SP" assign to storage unit type HIGH with bin section B (2 quants)

- "SP" assign to storage unit type MEDIUM with bin section C(1 quant)

 

But with this, the system will not allow the total 3 pallets. If you put a HIGH pallet in it, it's allowing only 2 quants.

 

How to resolve this or is this even possible?

 

Regards,

Kasper

↧

Close TR By Default?

July 26, 2011, 10:46 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am using Kanban replenishment via the PP / WM interface.

So I have a manufacturing storage location which places demand (via kanban) on a warehouse managed stores area.  This generates a TR, a TO is automatically created and when the TO is confirmed it automatically posts an IM move into the receiving storage location.  This also updates the kanban board.

 

My problem is that I do not wish to leave ANY open TR qty if, for example, the TR was for qty 100, but only qty 95 is picked and confirmed on a TO.

 

I do not want to leave an outstanding TR qty as in this scenario the kanban board would not update.

 

So my requirement is to always have the TR close when the TO is confirmed (regardless of the qty) (basically would like the 'close TR' check box to always be checked on t-code LT12).

 

Does anyone know a way that I can achieve this.

 

Many thanks in advance.

Regards

Guy

↧
↧

Storage location control at goods receipt (inbound delivery)

January 28, 2016, 5:40 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Our procured direct materials are all goods receipted per inbound delivery (IBD).

After packing the IBD, TOs are generated and GR is executed automatically after last TO confirmation.

This process is working perfectly.

 

Now we have the need for a part of these materials to physically store them in the warehouse at physical GR, but not have them available for replenishment until actual GR. My opinion is that storage location control at the warehouse should be the answer. Therefore I made following settings:

 

Plant:

PL01

Storage locations:

SL01 - Normal GR & SL02 - temporary storage

Warehouse:

WH1 with SL01 and SL02 assigned

Storage types:

902 - existing process & 903 - new process (copy from 902) and Z01 - final destination

WM movement types:

101 (src = 902 / ReqTp = B PO / manual TO not allowed / GR data in quant) & 901 (copy of 101 with src = 903)

Stor loc ref:

SD - existing process & AD - new process


Control of assignment Plant/Stor loc - Whse:

PL01 - SL01 - WH1 - Standard SL - SD

PL01 - SL02 - WH1 - SL not in TR - AD

Stor loc control in WM:

WH01 - 903 - PL01 - SL02 - 311 (also tried with 309) - combine posting changes

LE-WM interface to MM

Whse - Ref Mvmt T - SpSTInd - Movement Ind - SpStInd - SpMvInd - SL Ref - Mvmt T - TR create TR - All following fields

WH01 -      101        -               -        B            -              -               -    AD   -    901    -         X           -        blank

WH01 -      101        -               -        B            -              -               -    SD   -    101    -         X           -        blank

 

I changed the receiving stor loc in the scheduling agreement to SL02.

Creation of IBD for 840 PC with subsequent TO shows in LS24:

PL01 - SL02 - 903 - Pick Q 840 - Av St -840

PL01 - SL02 - Z01 - Ptaw St 840 - Av St 0

If I check the SAP help for "Define Storage Location Control" - Scenario 3 - Example 1 I would expect a TR without stor loc to be created as well for which stor loc becomes SL01 during conversion to TO. Unfortunately no TR is triggered.

 

After above TO confirmation the situation is:

PL01 - SL02 - 903 - Av St -840

PL01 - SL02 - Z01 - Av St 840

which means the stock is unavailable for replenishment (=ok), but there seems no way that LQ01 can be run so finally the material can be moved to SL01 and GR can be posted.

 

Do I misinterpret the SAP help or is something missing in my customizing?

Unmarking "combine posting changes" is not an option as we need to have manual control over when goods come available for replenishment.

 

Best regards

Geert

↧

Warehouse automatic gain/loss

February 3, 2016, 1:17 pm
$
0
0

Hello all

 

 

We have many articles in our warehouse where carton qty's in the global system do not match those in Australia.  Consequently we are constantly short picking.  SAP automatically sends these short picks to the gain/loss bin and we are having to daily move stock back to the pick bins.  I'm sure there is a way to deal with this and I would appreciate any tips anybody has.

↧

POD after invoice

January 16, 2016, 1:35 am
$
0
0

Hi.

 

I am creating STO->DEL->Proforma Invoice-> Excise Invoice in this case i need to create POD after proform/excise invoice but system is not allowing to create Invoce unless POD(VLPOD)is done.

 

How to achieve this?

 

Reg,

Antaa21

↧
Search

Unassign Current Assignment - Handling Unit.

January 20, 2016, 7:46 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I've activated WM with handling units in PP-PI. The PO creates the transfer orders for the components requirements  via WM material staging. The transfer orders select the corresponding HU where the components needed are in. But, due our customizing the transfer order selects the whole HU despite the PO only needs less quantity. That is right because the user moves all the HU.

Once the HU is at the corresponding storage we do the GI via COWBHUWA, of course, doing a partial GI.

After that we want to stage back the HU with the remaining units to the initial storage but the system doesn't allow it because the HU is assigned to an object. In this case is a Dynamic Bin Location (PO number).

 

LT10.png

humo.png

 

¿how can I stage back the HU to the original storage?

 

Best regards.

↧
↧

Capture user ID who blocked a bin

February 4, 2016, 8:00 am
$
0
0

Because standard SAP does not capture the user ID who blocks a bin with either an S block or an X block for stock removal, our company has stripped away authorizations to LS06 and LS07 from a large percentage of the employees. This, however, continues to create issues for process flows. Therefore, the company has asked if there is some way we could capture the user ID who blocked the bin.

My developer said he can append LQUA to add user ID, but we need a UE, FM, BAPI, something that will capture the data and send it to the appended table.

I have looked at several options, but can't find one that I think will do what we need. Has anyone else had a similar business request, and if yes, how did you resolve?

Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Marla Lemon

↧

L_TO_CREATE_DN for inbound delivery

February 4, 2016, 11:36 pm
$
0
0

Hi All

 

I have a requirement where we need to create transfer order for each handling units. The storage location is not HU Managed. The HU details are received from Vendor in the form of ASN. ie inbound delivery is created in SAP with HU Details in a non HU Managed WM location

 

For e.g. if a delivery has 100 quantity and it is packed in 3 handling units of 40EA, 30EA, 30EA.

 

It should create a transfer order for 40EA, 30EA, and 30EA for each handling units.

 

We are using L_TO_CREATE_DN function module to create transfer order. Whenever we pass quantity of 40 or 30 in VSOLM field to the function module it creates a transfer order for 100 quantity. But we need to create TO for 40, 40, and 30.

 

Is the function module we are using is right or we need to pass some other parameters?

 

It doesn't seem to work any help

 

Regards

Jayaram

↧

One Bin - One SKU

February 5, 2016, 11:48 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a scenario and can you let me know if this is possible.

 

 

H001 - St. Type

One SKU

Multiple SU

One Bin (Not Fixed)

 

Is the above scenario possible in standard.


A bin B001 in storage type (H001) has 100 Units of SKU001,then 


  • No other SKU should be allowed to be placed in bin B001 unless the bin is empty.
  • It should allow multiple SU of the same SKU

 

If the same bin B001 is empty

 

  • Then it should be possible to place SKU002 / SKU003 etc.
  • Once a SKU is placed then any other SKU should not be allowed until it is empty (It should allow multiple SU of the same SKU)

 

Regards

AMK

↧

LT03 Storage bin issue

January 18, 2016, 3:00 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

 

We are using “Shelf life expiration date” for stock removal strategy.

 

We are keeping the same material with same batch number in different storage bins.

 

  1. Creating the Sales order: In sale order we are creating the 2 line items for same material code i.e. chargeable and free items.
  2. Out bond delivery: In outbond delivery assigning the same batch for both line item hence for both line items  are same material code and batch number. (One is Chargeable and another one is free)
  3. Creating the TO in VL02N by choosing the subsequent function (or LT03) and we are choosing the “Generate TO item (F6) in LT03 screen.

 

The issue is while creating the TO, each line item qty picking from different bin because same material with same batch number keeping in different bin. Our requirement is it should not pick from different bin because still stock is available first bin. (Both items should pick from same bin).

 

I checked with manual option but it is time consuming and min having 100 or more line items in the Delivery.

 

 

Please suggest how to restrict the picking from different bin if the material code and batch number is same. 

 

 

Regards,

Hanmanth

↧
↧

LTOG TO cancellation updation in table

February 7, 2016, 10:02 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We are printing the pick list against the outbound delivery number before PGI. (Z-pick list print) . Outbound delivery number is the input for pick list print and we are fetching the data from LTAP table.

 

LT03 we are creating the transfer order against the outbound delivery and confirming the TO in LT12, if we need any changes or edit the quantity in Delivery for this we are cancelling the TO by LT0G. After changes in the Delivery again we are creating the TO by LT03. In this case 2 TO’s created. In LTAP or LTAK table no where updating the cancellation of 1st TO.

 

print input Once we take the pick list print both TO line items getting as output, we do not want the cancelled TO output.

 

How to find the cancelled transfer order by LT0G. Which table it will update the LT0G cancellation.

 

Please help to resolve the issue.

 

 

Regards,

Hanmanth

↧

Change batch info in transfer order before confirmation

February 8, 2016, 8:46 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am new in WM. I have a storage type configured with putaway strategy 'B' (Bulk storage) and without storage unit management. We cannot turn on SU management according to client business process. At the time of TO create, system populates batch number and bin info automatically in TO item. The problem is, user can pick different batch from the same bin at his convenience. Now in this case i need to update TO with the new batch number before TO confirmation.

 

Any thoughts please ?

 

Thank you,

Asif.

↧
Search

Bulk bin movement

February 8, 2016, 1:48 pm
$
0
0

Is there a Tcode to move in bulk all items from one bin to another?

↧

No deliveries available for making wave picks

February 8, 2016, 3:03 am
$
0
0

Hi,

When i look into LIKP&LIps table the delivery number is getting updated with Update group-STAFO filed is getting updated.

When i go to VL35,give time slot group i am getting the message as below,

No deliveries available for making wave picks

Message no. VO004

 

I have done some configuration setting,please find the screen shot.

 

What is the configuration setting i would have missed.

VL35.jpg

In the VL06P i could see the delivery numbers for picking,why is it not getting updated in VL35

Picking.jpg

↧
↧

Vendor : Account Number of Vendor or Creditor Missing

February 8, 2016, 7:59 am
$
0
0


I have created a delivery type "Return Pack Receipt" via transaction VL01NO but, I couldn't save the document due to an error message

Vendor : Account Number of Vendor or creditor missing . In fact, LF vendor couldn't be generated automatically, It taked value 0 and I can generate it manually .  other thin while checking table KLPA , customer and vendor are linked together .

↧

TO Number range jumping

February 8, 2016, 11:39 pm
$
0
0

Dear experts,

 

In our system, we observed few TO's for group (LT0E) are created with number greater than TO for individual issue against delivery.

Please refer below screenshot

 

Cl.WhNTO NumberMvTMTySCreatedTimeGroupTR NumberPostChNoDocumentCConf.Date
108101339490641601A1/31/20161:17:51 PM0000621446000080577576X1/31/2016
108101339558-850A1/31/20162:56:18 AM000062144600X1/31/2016

 

For e.g. TO 339558 is created (against group) earlier but number is greater than TO 339490 (against individual issue) which is created later.

Have you faced any issue similar to this. Also I would like to know does system keep buffer number range and skips number if TO creation screen is accessed but TO is not created (like material or quant)

Waiting for your reply.

 

Best Regards,

Munawwar

↧

execute discrete production

February 9, 2016, 2:45 am
$
0
0

Hello  Team

 

I have to prepare ppt slides for execute discrete production.So anyone can please provide the details to get the ppt or explain the process flow .

 

Thanks in advance

 

Regards

thamm

↧
Viewing all 912 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>