Hi,
I have an Idoc with an information:
Message Type: SHPMNT
Basic Type: SHPMNT05
E1EDL37-KDMAT35_EXTERNAL = M (packaging Code)
E1EDL37-KDMAT35_VERSION = K (customer is property of this material)
I'm trying to find where I define this information in master data in order to solve an issue. But I coudn't found where is defined this information
Can anyone helpme with this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Gus
Hi Gurus,
New to this forum, recently we implemented Transportation module at our client place. Client has a requirement of having the shipment completion date at shipment level to be copied over to the Actual GI date in Delivery. Pls let me know if this can be handled with some config or can be handled with some enhancement. I checked in the forum and couldn't find the exact thread which could answer this requirement. Kindly provide some inputs so that i can build on it further. Appreciate your help. We are having the setting of PGIing the delivery once Shipment completion tab is selected. This date at shipment completion should be populated at delivery in Actual GI date field. Pls let me know if you need more information on this.
Regards,
US
Hi Experts,
We are using “Shelf life expiration date” for stock removal strategy.
We are keeping the same material with same batch number in different storage bins.
The issue is while creating the TO, each line item qty picking from different bin because same material with same batch number keeping in different bin. Our requirement is it should not pick from different bin because still stock is available first bin. (Both items should pick from same bin).
I checked with manual option but it is time consuming and min having 100 or more line items in the Delivery.
Please suggest how to restrict the picking from different bin if the material code and batch number is same.
Regards,
Hanmanth
Our pricing model with our freight vendor is based on volume. We have minimum charge and the normal cubic charge. If the cubic charge is below minimum then the minimum is turned-on and the normal cubic charged is turned-off.
The challenge is sometimes we have 2 deliveries for the same customer and the volume is both below minimum. The system is now creating 2 minimum cubic charge wherein what we want to happen is for the system to combine the volume first and then apply the rule of minimum cubic charge or normal cubic charge.
Has anyone solved this already?
Hi Experts,
Anyone facing the shipment cost cancelation problem after upgraded SAP to EHP7.
The problem can be derive from the missing of the profit center for the materials in the shipment cost that we found out.
We don't have issue for those shipment costs that not yet transfer because we still can manually add in the account assignment. While for those
shipment cost that already transfered before the system upgrade we have problem to do the cancellation. When cancellation and save the shipment
cost is like no error whereas the cancelation not done. Now we have no way out to do the cancellation.
Attached the screen shot for the shipment cost that we having problem to cancel.
Rdgs,
Arthur
Hi,
Please let me know the Configuration for SA for Inbound & Outbound IDOC
Regards
Amey Kulkarni
Hi
Can anyone help me with the above mentioned issue.
I am getting this error when i am trying to create a transfer order in LT09 to move stocks from interim bin(storage type 923) to the actual bin. Storage unit ***** as well as the HU is present. When i checked the bin status report in LX03, I have stocks (qty 96) of material 'A' in storage type 923.
I want to move this stocks from interim bin to some other actual bin and when i am trying in LT09 , i am getting this error. Can anyone please help me to solve this issue so that i can move the stocks to the actual bin.
Thanks in advance.
Hi
I have a requirement where only 1 SUT should be allowed to be binned. Its possible for the material to arrive in a SUT P1 and P2. In the MM I have P1 as my first pallatization and P2 as the 2nd. Putaway strategy is manual.
Extract from SAP Help:
You can stipulate that the storage bin can contain only one standard storage unit type. This is taken from the first SUT field under Palletization data in the material master record.
So my understanding is that in this case I would only be allowed to bin a P1 in the bins within the storage type and never a P2?
Also, I did the config and I first binned a P1 and then after this the system also let me bin a P2?
What im actually want is that both P1 and P2 should be able to be binned but if either SUT first is binned then only the same SUT can be binned until the bin is empty.
What am I missing?
Thanks
Clayton
Dear SAP experts,
We are in SAP ECC EHP 6. We are now testing the functionality of handling unit. To be sure, we dont want to have the full-blown HU functionality, eg. we just want to pack our delivery items and that's about it, as when it is received in the other branch (eg. stock transfer scenario), it will be unpacked and then kept in the storage location.
We have tried the following:
1. Create STO (using ME21N)
2. Create outbound delivery (using VL10B)
3. Edit the delivery and pack (generating HU - Handling Unit) --> HU status: PHEX WHSE (physically exist in wharehouse)
4. Set pick quantity and good issue (VL02N) --> HU status: PSTD (good issue posted)
5. GR for outbound delivery (MIGO) --> HU status not changed: PSTD
Note that from point 5, my materials are received already, but im not sure about the HU. The HU status is still PSTD, and I think it shouldnt be that way. Can someone share to me, how the process should be done in this scenario?
Best regards,
John
Hi,
Our procured direct materials are all goods receipted per inbound delivery (IBD).
After packing the IBD, TOs are generated and GR is executed automatically after last TO confirmation.
This process is working perfectly.
Now we have the need for a part of these materials to physically store them in the warehouse at physical GR, but not have them available for replenishment until actual GR. My opinion is that storage location control at the warehouse should be the answer. Therefore I made following settings:
Plant:
PL01
Storage locations:
SL01 - Normal GR & SL02 - temporary storage
Warehouse:
WH1 with SL01 and SL02 assigned
Storage types:
902 - existing process & 903 - new process (copy from 902) and Z01 - final destination
WM movement types:
101 (src = 902 / ReqTp = B PO / manual TO not allowed / GR data in quant) & 901 (copy of 101 with src = 903)
Stor loc ref:
SD - existing process & AD - new process
Control of assignment Plant/Stor loc - Whse:
PL01 - SL01 - WH1 - Standard SL - SD
PL01 - SL02 - WH1 - SL not in TR - AD
Stor loc control in WM:
WH01 - 903 - PL01 - SL02 - 311 (also tried with 309) - combine posting changes
LE-WM interface to MM
Whse - Ref Mvmt T - SpSTInd - Movement Ind - SpStInd - SpMvInd - SL Ref - Mvmt T - TR create TR - All following fields
WH01 - 101 - - B - - - AD - 901 - X - blank
WH01 - 101 - - B - - - SD - 101 - X - blank
I changed the receiving stor loc in the scheduling agreement to SL02.
Creation of IBD for 840 PC with subsequent TO shows in LS24:
PL01 - SL02 - 903 - Pick Q 840 - Av St -840
PL01 - SL02 - Z01 - Ptaw St 840 - Av St 0
If I check the SAP help for "Define Storage Location Control" - Scenario 3 - Example 1 I would expect a TR without stor loc to be created as well for which stor loc becomes SL01 during conversion to TO. Unfortunately no TR is triggered.
After above TO confirmation the situation is:
PL01 - SL02 - 903 - Av St -840
PL01 - SL02 - Z01 - Av St 840
which means the stock is unavailable for replenishment (=ok), but there seems no way that LQ01 can be run so finally the material can be moved to SL01 and GR can be posted.
Do I misinterpret the SAP help or is something missing in my customizing?
Unmarking "combine posting changes" is not an option as we need to have manual control over when goods come available for replenishment.
Best regards
Geert
Hello,
Is it possible to use mvt types 701-702 in order to post inventory differences?
Thank you
Hi,
I am using Kanban replenishment via the PP / WM interface.
So I have a manufacturing storage location which places demand (via kanban) on a warehouse managed stores area. This generates a TR, a TO is automatically created and when the TO is confirmed it automatically posts an IM move into the receiving storage location. This also updates the kanban board.
My problem is that I do not wish to leave ANY open TR qty if, for example, the TR was for qty 100, but only qty 95 is picked and confirmed on a TO.
I do not want to leave an outstanding TR qty as in this scenario the kanban board would not update.
So my requirement is to always have the TR close when the TO is confirmed (regardless of the qty) (basically would like the 'close TR' check box to always be checked on t-code LT12).
Does anyone know a way that I can achieve this.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards
Guy
Hi Experts
Sales order delivery is packed in the handling unit but it deleted by the user without unpacking it and another delivery is packed in the HU and PGI has been done ,the 1st delivery number material is in a warehouse which is storage unit managed and handling unit number and storage unit number of the deleted delivery number are equal .So to remove the the link between HU and SU.
Regards
Hi.
I am creating STO->DEL->Proforma Invoice-> Excise Invoice in this case i need to create POD after proform/excise invoice but system is not allowing to create Invoce unless POD(VLPOD)is done.
How to achieve this?
Reg,
Antaa21
Hi there,
Please advise on the following:
Parts are backflushed. SP01 is then run to print labels, however it does not seem to work. The issue is only with one part. All the other label printing for parts work fine. What could be the problem? and how do we solve it?
Thanks
Hi all,
Can someone help me to avoid that delivery items for the same material are packed in the same HU?
My users use auto-packing based on packing instructions.
Current scenario:
Material 112267 has a packing instruction that says: 25 pcs per carton.
Delivery item # 10: material 112267 for 30 pcs
Delivery item # 20: material 112267 for 30 pcs
Auto-pack will create 3 HU's: 2 x 25 pcs and 1 x 10 pcs
For some customers, I need the following scenario:
Auto-pack will create 4 HU's: 2 x 25 pcs, and 2 x 5 pcs.
I do not want the 5+5 pcs to be packed in the same carton / HU.
How to control this, and how to make it customer-specific?
Thank you in advance !
RVS
I have been trying to set this up without success.
1. If I set up an external number range and assign it, then the system tells me to set up an internal number range.
2. If I set up an internal number range the system does not allow manual input (external assignment from internal number range not allowed).
I have allowed internal and external assignment for the warehouse.
This is the error that I get when trying scenario 2.
"External assignment of numbers from an internal number range not allowed
Message no. L3212
Diagnosis
The external storage unit number to be issued is in an internal number range.
Procedure
Unlike other applications, external number ranges in the WM system are not explicitly defined. Instead, they are taken from the unused numbers in the internal number ranges when the "Issue type" switch in the Customizing application allows external numbers to be issued for the warehouse number."
So does this saying that external number assignment is not possible? Or is it saying that I have to use internal range even for external numbering? What is the solution?
Hello all,
I'm facing a problem in WM:
After the materials is transferred from Quality Inspection Area to Unrestricted Area (movement Type 321) from T-Code QA32/QA12, the Transfer Order is
NOT getting created, and the quantity stays in interim Storage type 922 in both stock category Unrestricted and Quality.
How can I get the Transfer Order screen appear after T-Code QA12?
What settings should I check in order the Transfer Order to be created?
Thank you
Regards,
Kifah Yacoub
Hello,
Please give me your input regarding the issue I have.
Everytime I try to create a Physical Inventory Document with "MICN" I get this error :
Message no. M7836"
The material has set the ABC indicator.
I don't know that am I doing wrong?
Thank you
Hi everybody. Recently this problem has been happening on deliveries from plant transfer POs. When the TO is confirmed for the delivery, the packing material from the UC is placed as a line item in the delivery. This is not supposed to happen, packing materials are not supposed to be copied into the deliveries in our processes. Can anyone help?